Pages

Wednesday, April 2, 2025

Winning Warriors Playoff Ticket: Not a April Fool's Day

In the afternoon of March 31, I received a flurry of emails from the office of City Manager and Human Resources (HR), talking about the lottery for tickets to go to the Warriors Playoff game the following evening. I did not pay too much attention, since they were mostly addressed to all users, until our Director Christopher came down to our office to congratulate me on winning a ticket plus two guests. 

The curtain of a full drama was thus lifted. After sharing the good news with Paul, I confirmed with HR about my intention of going, and listed my preferred email address and cellphone number. As instructed, I would receive an eTicket soon. If not receiving it by 5:00 pm the next day, I should email a designated email address for assistance. 

The next came quickly, but without any trace of the ticket. Since we had invited Jim to a pre-game pizza dinner, and game as a second guest, it was my responsibility to secure a definitive answer by 5:00 pm. In the face of a total silence from the authoritative source, I started to bug people for follow-up details. I started by emailing my other two fellow winners, and managed to wangle a name and address for a personal contact. The contact promised that in the next hour, we would receive our tickets, but without avail. A quarter before 5:00 pm, I finally emailed HR. As if to preempt winners' due anxiety, the HR manager sent out messages stating that the tickets would duly arrive in each one's account before the game at 7:00 pm. She and her department were working frantically and closely with Ticketmaster.

At Woodstock Pizza, I wolfed down my three pieces, while my eyes were gluing to my phone for any glimmer of news. At 6:19 pm, a confirmation email finally came. Three admission tickets were indeed in Paul's Messages. Without further ado, the guys happily gobbled their last bite of pizza and the rest of their beers. We three left Woodstock to go straight to Kaiser Permanent Arena in the rain and under a rainbow. At 6:38 pm, the arena was half full. We were inspected at the entrance, but immediately rewarded with our long-lusted-after t-shirts and a portrait of the Santa Cruz Warriors. Our seats in D-section were decent, according to Jim, a seasoned Warrior fan and loyal attender of games. 

Paul and Jim with new shirts and portrait

At 7:00 pm sharp, the game began with the national anthem. It was a solemn moment with everyone standing up towards the American flag. I have seen similar occasions before on TV, but not in person. This is the second time I had been to a sports event. It was decades ago when Nick bought us tickets to go to a football game between Cal and Stanford in Berkeley. The first game was lost to the guest team, even though there were many highlights of catching up and even scoring ahead ten points and more. 

Scoreboard shows a close match

It was the City's plan to fill the arena with spectators, so as to render support to the first Warriors playoff game against the Valley Suns. The City was certainly not disappointed in its plan. As warned beforehand by our courier drive Jon, the arena was filled with deafening sound and noise from many a sturdy man or woman fan. An extra heavy set man behind our row was thumping and shaking the whole section at the slightest provocation, while his young daughter was constantly shrill with her high-pitched cry for "Defense."

There were many professional Warrior fans. In front of our row, sat three families with a dozen kids, all of similar age. They started by constantly buying snacks, drinks, and memorabilia, but recouped their expenses by catching all freebies thrown in our direction. At the height of 6'6" or more, one of the three men netted all freebies without a miss with his extra long arms waving all directions. It was quite a rare skill.

We left a little before 9:00 pm under the crescent of a new moon, ending two exciting days after winning the ticket. The experience was real, definitely not a April Fool's Day joke!

Myself with our favorite mascot

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

We Have Got Visas

For two weeks in a row (February 26 and March 3), Paul and I went to the Chinese Consulate located at Laguna and Geary in San Francisco, to apply for our visas to China. We are going to attend the 50th Anniversary Reunion of our Foreign Language Training Class. 

It is no easy task to get the visa yourself. You have to have your most recent visa photos properly taken by a professional service like Bay Photo, fill in the application online, go to the consulate in person to submit your passports, and finally return to the consulate to get back your passports after paying $140 visa processing fee, if your visa is approved. Thanks to Paul's wealth of experience and famed time management, we did everything strictly according to the schedule. To eliminate any hassels in street parking, Paul had even consulted ChatGPT to find the closest garage, namely, Japan Center Garage at 1737 Post Street. Leaving home no later than 6:00 a.m., we managed to arrive at the destination and secure our position in the front middle line that inevitably meandered around the corner to Eddy Street, when the consulate was open for business at 9:30 a.m.

The long journey to obtain our visas is not without its glimmers of joy. Thanks also to Paul's vigilant supervision, Tesla Y drove us tirelessly and safely twice from Santa Cruz to San Francisco, and then from San Francisco to Santa Cruz, right before noontime. It then sat on the driveway, sipping electricity quietly after 9:00 p.m. The other unforgettable moment was when Paul saw the M letter in the entry category. After a closer look, we saw that the visa expiration date as February 3, 2035. It seems that we were granted multiple entries for 10 years! Without further ado, Paul strode to Window One to double-check and received the due confirmation. Wish the staff could inform us of this extraordinarily good news when we had been there to receive our visas. Oh well, maybe it is always better to find out things yourself.

With one month to go before our departure, both Paul and I have loads of work ahead to complete and plan. But we have got our visas!


Friday, February 21, 2025

Name Changes for Gulf of Mexico & Mount Denali

Per my manager's suggestion, I summarized a recent event and posted the summary on Around the Water Cooler, a posting board on our intranet. Below is the full content.



Background

In January 20, 2025, U.S. president Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14172. To respond, the Library of Congress (LC) published LIBRARY OF CONGRESS SUBJECT HEADINGS TENTATIVE MONTHLY LIST 12 LCSH 2 (February 13, 2025). The two proposed geographic names changes are Gulf of Mexico, and Mount Denali. Heated debates and responses have appeared in AUTOCAT, an international electronic discussion list devoted to the cataloging and authority control community. We at CMS have selected a few representative responses and resources for your reference. Thank you.


Deadlines for Public Comments: 2/18/2025

Proposed LCSH change from Mexico, Gulf of to America, Gulf of. Comments are due TODAY. Send all comments on this list to the Policy, Training, and Cooperative Programs Division - Email: listcomments@loc.gov by Tuesday, February 18, 2025.

Proposed LCSH change from Denali, Mount (Alaska) to McKinley, Mount (Alaska). Comments are due TODAY. Send all comments on this list to the Policy, Training, and Cooperative Programs Division - Email: listcomments@loc.gov by Tuesday, February 18, 2025.


Response from PTCP (Policy, Training & Cooperative Programs Division, LC): 2/19/2025

PTCP acknowledges the communications that the Library has received in response to tentative monthly list 12 LCSH 2 (list 2412a). The Library of Congress defers to the United States Board on Geographic Names (BGN) for place names contained within our controlled vocabularies and classification. For more information, please see our Subject Headings Manual sheet H 690 Formulating Geographic Headings [https://www.loc.gov/aba/publications/FreeSHM/H0690.pdf] and visit the BGN webpage [https://www.usgs.gov/us-board-on-geographic-names]

Judith P. Cannan

Chief, Policy, Training & Cooperative Programs Division

ABA Directorate, LCSG

Library of Congress, Washington D.C. 20540


Response from SAC (Subject Analysis Committee, American Library Association): 2/20/2025

To: Policy, Training, and Cooperative Programs Division (PTCP), Library of Congress

We are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed name changes of Gulf of Mexico and Mount Denali on Tentative Monthly List 12 LCSH 2 (February 13, 2025), as well as the manner in which this list has been shared to the cataloging community.

The changes are not based on literary warrant, but political concerns. One of the names, Gulf of America, is less than a month old at time of proposal, while the previous name has been in use for centuries. The abrupt creation and implementation of this name change, as well as the unclear nature of its scope create uncertainty for catalogers applying geographic terms. The one-to-one name change is also inaccurate, as Executive Order 14172 states that name is meant to refer to “the U.S. Continental Shelf area bounded on the northeast, north, and northwest by the States of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Florida and extending to the seaward boundary with Mexico and Cuba,” which is not the extent of the Gulf of Mexico.

The name Mount Denali has been used by Indigenous communities for centuries. Changing the name to Mount McKinley contradicts the “nothing about us without us” policy adopted by the Library of Congress respecting Indigenous peoples and place names. According to the Library of Congress’s Interim guidelines for Indigenous heading proposals, “the Library’s guiding principle is to ensure consultation with the described community” to ensure that “the name chosen for [a] heading is the name preferred by the group of people themselves.” As reported by the Guardian, Indigenous Alaskans are dismayed by Trump's renaming and were opposed to the change according to Native News Online.

The change also comes as a departure from Library of Congress precedent in not recognizing politically-motivated geographic name changes, such as “Biafra, Bight of” (instead of “Bonny, Bight of”). The extensive number of geographical names on the list only serve to show the extent of the issue with changing the heading, both in terms of common use and clarity of scope. This change will have negative impacts on our catalogs and create problems for library users, particularly in libraries that do not have the staffing or ability to implement local changes.

Furthermore, it is extraordinary for a change to be made this quickly, with one of the citations in the change proposal dated the day the list was circulated, and that being the only day that comments will be received on this portion of the list. This goes against the considered nature of the way changes and additions should be made in a widely shared controlled vocabulary, particularly one that is used internationally. The short time frame precludes consultation or comment both from international bodies such as the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names (UNGEGN), and from non-United States based institutions which use LCSH and where no executive order has been issued to change these well-known geographic locations.

The changes proposed on Tentative List 2412a are not motivated by, nor do they provide, improved accuracy, accessibility or discoverability for library patrons, either within the US or in libraries worldwide. As a group interested in the improvement of subject analysis, we oppose the implementation of these changes.

Sincerely,

Subject Analysis Committee of the American Library Association


Additional Resources 

Executive Order 14172—Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202500139/pdf/DCPD-202500139.pdf 

Gulf of Mexico

https://www.britannica.com/place/Gulf-of-Mexico-Gulf-of-America 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Mexico

Mount Denali

https://www.britannica.com/place/Denali

Denali - Wikipedia

Monday, February 3, 2025

A Report to Santa Cruz Public Libraries' LJPA Board


The following is a report to be delivered at the Library Joint Powers Authority (LJPA) Board meeting on 6 February 2025 at Aptos Branch Library.

***************************

STAFF REPORT

DATE:              February 6, 2025

TO:              Library Joint Powers Authority Board

FROM:             Christopher Platt, Library Director 

RE:                  Bulletin Publication

...

BACKGROUND

A staff librarian here at Santa Cruz Public Libraries (SCPL), Hui-Lan Titangos, has authored two articles published by the California State Library Foundation (CSLF) that we would like to highlight. Her latest article has been printed as a four-part series in the Bulletin, a CSLF quarterly publication. Hui-Lan has also authored a special edition entitled Harriet G. Eddy and California County Libraries. The Library would like to congratulate Hui-Lan on her professional accomplishments as well as announce them to the Board and the community. These publications can be found at the Library for a further reading.

DISCUSSION

After reading this very article on Laura Steffens Suggett, a friend of ours observed, “We all grew up taking libraries for granted, but of course there’s a lot of history to learn about how they were developed out here in the west.”[i] Interestingly, her comment is a perfect entrée into the story of Laura.

At the turn of the 20th century, libraries in California were at a critical crossroads. Unlike today, the California State Library (CSL) was a closed entity, serving exclusively state legislators and officials; a handful of tax-supported town/city libraries were in their infancy, barely able to support themselves fiscally or geographically. There were more people living outside the city/town boundary than within. It was not until the ninth State Librarian James L. Gillis (1857-1917) took the office in 1899 when fundamental changes started to take place in California. He modernized the CSL by opening it to all Californians, hiring professional staff, correcting the prevalent nepotism, and establishing library schools. Moreover, he unified a supermajority of new public libraries to the county library system, so as to create a far more financially sustainable model surviving and thriving up to now in the state of California. Despite his untimely death in October 1917, Gillis succeeded in modernizing and developing California libraries, in large part due to his two able assistants, Laura Steffens Suggett (1874-1946), and Harriet G. Eddy (1876-1966) who assisted him in implementing the county library system.

As Second Assistant State Librarian, Laura is one of the most important pioneers in the history of California libraries. She was Gillis’s very first hire in 1902. After graduating from Stanford University and four years’ graduate study in Germany, Laura helped him to transform the CSL into a true leader of all California libraries, and assisted him in planning and launching the California county library system. As head of the Extension Department, she led a series of library experiments to reach out to underserved residents through her four divisions, Traveling Libraries, Study Club, Public Libraries, and Books for the Blind. In addition, she created California’s first union catalog that enabled the beginning of interlibrary (ILL) service in the state. Today, we can still trace her resulting work when using WorldShare of OCLC (Online Computer Library Center), or Link+ in California.

To celebrate their lives and achievements for the first time in history, two biographical projects came into being. They are A bright Star over the California State Library: the Life and Work of Laura Steffens Suggett (published in four parts in 2024 Bulletin, #141 through #144), and Harriet G. Eddy and California County Libraries: a New Interpretation (published as 2021 Special Edition). The projects are made possible through collaboration between publisher CSLF, and author Hui-Lan Titangos, a librarian at SCPL.

We hope that you will enjoy our biographical projects. We also hope that more projects will be added to the list, so that we can remember the past, savor the present, and plan for a better and brighter future. 

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­____________________

[1] Bone, Deborah. Laura Steffens Suggett. Email; Sun, 5 January 2025, 10:50 PM

 Report Prepared by: Hui-Lan Titangos, Librarian II

 Reviewed and Forwarded by: Christopher Platt, Library Director


Monday, January 13, 2025

Chasing the Green Sun



Congratulations to Paul who has won his second Photo Contest in GT!

Paul and I are opposites in many ways. For one thing, he thinks in graphics while I think in words. He is a very determined guy, seldom giving up on his hopes and dreams, while I am easily distracted, often giving in to setbacks.

January 4, 2025, Paul and I went to the Lake Moran Beach for the sunset. Perhaps it was because of the New Year, there were clusters of visitors at our usual perch. A lady squeezed in between Paul and another man with a serious camera. Just as the sun started to dip into the horizon, I heard her asking Paul if he had ever seen a green flash at sunset. Paul shook his head and told her that he had only seen a green cast in the sky after the sunset in his hometown Ohio back in the late 60's.

"No, no," the lady explained. The green she referred to was a flash of green right as the sun dropped under the horizon. In her lifetime, she witnessed it twice, once in Santa Cruz and another time in Oregon. Paul found her experience interesting, even though he had never heard of it. He was unusually quiet on our way back to the Pleasure Point, and then the Hook. The fascinating story apparently was rooted in his head. 

The very next day, Sunday the 5th, we went to Seacliff State Beach for a late stroll and managed to see another sunset. All of a sudden, Paul excitedly told me that he had seen the green flash. As the sun began to make the final slip below the horizon and disappeared into the ocean, he began to back off on his telephoto and used a slightly wider shot. Just as the sun was about to disappear altogether, he saw some green beginning to appear. He kept shooting until the green grew to a large emerald green bright flash in the previous sunspot for a second or two. With a dim blue puff, all was gone. 

Right next to him, I managed to miss the rare green opportunity, due to a untimely distraction to practice panorama shots. Paul contributed this moment to his dumb luck, but I am more inclined to think of it as being a sharpened goal for a new discovery right after his conversation with the lady the day before on Moran Beach. "Fortune favors the prepared," as the old saying goes. It has been proven that it is extremely rare to witness the green flash, it is rarer to have caught it on camera!

According to Paul, "The Green Flash is a phenomenon that sometimes occurs just after sunset or right before sunrise. It happens when the sun is almost entirely below the horizon, and for a brief moment, the upper rim of the sun appears green. This is caused by the refraction of sunlight through the Earth's atmosphere, which disperses the light and makes the green part of the spectrum visible. As the sun sets, the sunlight refracts from red, orange, yellow and then to green, progressing through the "ROYGBIV" colors. It is extremely rare and usually only lasts a couple of seconds. Here, in the last frame you can also dimly see a bit of blue spectrum."

The following is a video produced by Paul Titangos from his series of photos.

Photography by Paul Titangos, 5 January 2025, Seascape State Beach, Santa Cruz, CA

My Blog Archive